Their should not be automatic selection for any representative teams.
.
Why not??
How is having a roll off or a camp benefitting the best bowlers??? Bowling is a form and result game.
Having roll offs or camps only benefits the weaker bowlers....kind of like saying "Well my results over the past 2 years are not that good, but ill just go to the camp and roll dice"
If you are not close to the team, why should you be giving a chance?? Work harder, bowl some more, bowl better and work your way up.... How do you think a 2 handed bowler from the country did it???
If I was running the show, I would a point 2 people. A coach and a assistant coach. Their job, for how ever long their contracts last, is to build a team over a 2 year period.
Basically, those 2 people, build a squad, make them practice certain parts of their game and have monthly reports on these bowlers.
These coaches would go to as many events as they could to see up and comming talent, as well as watching the form of their current squad.
If a player needs to be substituted in and out of the squad, then the 2 coaches make that decision and explain why!
These 2 coaches also report to the board of TBA every month and explain how the 'high performance' funding has been used.
When a FIQ comes along, these 2 coaches basically, have to have a team built, with great foundations and then as a team, work towards preparing for the FIQ.
The coaches would pick their 6 (from their squad of say 10) depending on who they believe will have the best chances at winning.
If the team does not do well, the coaches are asked questions....if the answers are not what the board want to hear then they are sacked and 2 more are appointed.......
Every other form/result sport picks teams on FORM and RESULTS...GOLF, SOCCER, CRICKET, RUGBY.......all of them!
But for some reason, bowling wants a crap shoot?
Just an update: Team USA, SWEDEN, FINLAND, ENGLAND, MALAYSIA and SINGAPORE, guess how they picked their teams? Guess what they are doing right now?
And where are we again?
Belmo