i am sorry i offend anyone with this post but something has to be said.
the national ranking system currently in use is a complete joke , can someone tell how a tournament with 28 bowlers gets a national ranking!!! and how the winner of that tournament will get 80 points bowling against 27 other bowlers , yet the winner of a super 6 event gets 100 and beats 100+ bowlers????
the system needs to be changed i agree with the lane policy tba have brought in but there should be limit on the amount of bowlers u need to have before u get a national ranking. lets say 60 bowlers if you can't attract 60 bowlers with a $2500 top prize then the tourny shouldn't get national ranking points!!!
the way the current system works u won't get the best bowler as number 1 in the country, u will get the best bowler who can afford to bowl the most tournaments!!!!!!!!!
ps. i am not having a go at any bowler just the system in use.
the national ranking system currently in use is a complete joke , can someone tell how a tournament with 28 bowlers gets a national ranking!!! and how the winner of that tournament will get 80 points bowling against 27 other bowlers , yet the winner of a super 6 event gets 100 and beats 100+ bowlers????
the system needs to be changed i agree with the lane policy tba have brought in but there should be limit on the amount of bowlers u need to have before u get a national ranking. lets say 60 bowlers if you can't attract 60 bowlers with a $2500 top prize then the tourny shouldn't get national ranking points!!!
the way the current system works u won't get the best bowler as number 1 in the country, u will get the best bowler who can afford to bowl the most tournaments!!!!!!!!!
ps. i am not having a go at any bowler just the system in use.