Hi George,
Yes, I will do some checking to clarify the issue but, as mentioned in my post above, I don't think there is a real issue here. No one thought too carefully about the wording on THIS year's (2001) Western Open Entry Form, they just copied the wording from LAST year's (2000) Western Open Entry Form, which, in turn, was copied from the PREVIOUS year's (1999) Western Open Entry Form, and so on down the Ages ..........!!!
In my view, this year's Brisbane Cup Entry Form is just the latest manifestation of the out-dated wording "popping-up" again. The same words appeared on the 2000 Maryborough Wide Bay Entry Form, would you believe?!!!
. They were not on this year's Maryborough form because Charlie Patterson acquired the Centre during the intervening period.
The restriction certainly does not apply to any of the Tournaments on TBAL's Official National Open Rankings Program. Typically the wording on the Entry Forms for these events requires that bowlers be
"...current TBA members" (e.g. 2001 S.A. Cup, Koolfoam, Canberra Open, NSW Open, etc.), or
"...current TBAL members or members of F.I.Q. affilliated federations" (2001 Australian Open), or
"...2001 TBA Sanctioned members", (Rosemount Cup), etc., etc. So, don't worry
, win as much dough as you can off those Yanks and, when you get back home, you will still be "virgo-intacta",
at least as far as bowling in the Aussie events that matter is concerned.
Incidently, if there is an issue, it's not about cashing (how much money have Tim and Cara won?), it's about being a member of a "professional" organisation. I suspect there coul be legal issues here; restraint of trade, restriction of free-association, etc, as well as a lack of commercial logic in the context of today's bowling environment.