D
-d-_-b-
Ok i am going to have to word this very carefully as i know this topic is touchy to begin with.
The reason i am writing this is in responce to Milkman closing the intercentre topic afer concern of people "chatting" and his dislike to it.
I am mainly wondering, where is the concern of chatting, and moreso whats the difference between this "chatting" and discussion on a bowling topic?
I haven't been on this board for overly long, however i have noticed a decline in posts over few months i have been participating in it.
I know personally i am erring toward other boards as each time a check this one nothing much is being said. The reason is because if you are purely limited to posting educated opinions on bowling limited matter than if there aren't any tournaments on then there isn't really that much to talk about.
The area where i am concerned is where educated discussion decays into mere chatting?
The post which was closed as a result of repeat chatting offences was focusing recently on a game between two bowlers, i fail to see the discussion about this as different to posting and discussion on THE ODDS by belmo, or posting up the bowling cards in the general forum. Where is the difference, its all bowling related, and all of could equally take part on icq or through email???
I am just confussed as to why such a stance was taken against the intercentre post, and more particularly the exact reasons as to its occurance
The reason i am writing this is in responce to Milkman closing the intercentre topic afer concern of people "chatting" and his dislike to it.
I am mainly wondering, where is the concern of chatting, and moreso whats the difference between this "chatting" and discussion on a bowling topic?
I haven't been on this board for overly long, however i have noticed a decline in posts over few months i have been participating in it.
I know personally i am erring toward other boards as each time a check this one nothing much is being said. The reason is because if you are purely limited to posting educated opinions on bowling limited matter than if there aren't any tournaments on then there isn't really that much to talk about.
The area where i am concerned is where educated discussion decays into mere chatting?
The post which was closed as a result of repeat chatting offences was focusing recently on a game between two bowlers, i fail to see the discussion about this as different to posting and discussion on THE ODDS by belmo, or posting up the bowling cards in the general forum. Where is the difference, its all bowling related, and all of could equally take part on icq or through email???
I am just confussed as to why such a stance was taken against the intercentre post, and more particularly the exact reasons as to its occurance