USBC and the plan to save the sport of bowling

wchester

Bowling Tragic
USBC to review System of Bowling
6/22/2005

HolmanMarshall.jpg
"The credibility of power is lost, and the game is hurt because of it."
- Marshall Holman

In the 1970s and 80s, Marshall Holman was a special bowler; he was a special athlete. The most electric performer of his day and the most consistently dominant pro bowler of the 1980s, Holman won 22 career Professional Bowlers Association titles in his Hall-of-Fame career.

Holman will be mostly remembered for the way he changed the game and inspired legions of youth bowlers through his evolved approach to the sport. Although he weighed just 140 pounds, Holman combined power and accuracy to such a healthy degree that he surged to the front of pro tournaments by hundreds of pins. At centers throughout the country, bowlers spent hour after hour practicing Holman's brilliant release. Holman was a star.

Larry Lichstein, the storied ball driller who spent decades on the PBA Tour, described Holman's unique talent in the November 1976 edition of Bowlers Journal magazine: "(Holman's) leverage and his strong lift allow him to create a devastating roll on his ball: he'll blow a 5-pin out of the rack harder than almost anybody."

Within that description rests a concern in the development and future of bowling as a viable sport. Does anyone in competitive bowling really concern themselves with the 5-pin anymore? No.

That's a major reason why Holman quit bowling competitively in the 1990s. His Olympian skill to "blow the 5-pin out of the rack" had been cheapened by the modern game, in particular the invention of resin and particle bowling balls with exotic core designs. The new balls, drilled with expert touches, were made compatible with increasingly forgiving lane conditions. Suddenly, hooking power had more to do with technology than the bowler. According to Holman, his skill of applying manmade power to the ball is now meaningless.

After all, today everybody gets the 5-pin out. Angles into the pocket have been redefined by an increased friction between lanes and balls that feature dynamic imbalances in modern bowling, resulting in amateur, youth and senior bowlers breaking scoring records at a blistering pace.

"The credibility of power is lost, and the game is hurt because of it," Holman says. "The balls I used during the '70s and '80s would be like golfers today using hickory shafts. Now, less is more. The less you do to the ball, the harder it hits."

That equation doesn't make sense to Holman.
"When Mark Roth was dominant in the 1970s, he took advantage of power," Holman says. "It seemed at the time that was the logical way it should be. If you could be accurate, control speed and be powerful, why wouldn't you be rewarded?"

Holman, a former ESPN broadcaster who now owns an income tax company and has no current financial ties to bowling, explains the problem with today's game in his eyes: "The balls have taken the players and squished them together," Holman says. "The ball has given all realms of releases hitting power."

Holman knows the number of league bowlers in the United States has dwindled in the past 20 years.

"The 'less is more' system doesn't work," Holman says. "At least part of the reason for people quitting bowling has to be the lack of needing to work at something to be good at it. Part of the problem has to be ease of scoring nowadays."

Today, Holman bowls one league night a week in his hometown of Medford, Ore. He says he never practices, misses 30 percent of league nights due to conflicting commitments and averages, "around 230." That's higher than any average Holman registered on the PBA Tour in his prime.

"I should be around 205 now," says Holman, who is dismayed by his belief that choosing the right equipment has become the most important aspect of the modern game.

The United States Bowling Congress, formed in January 2005, is concerned with the degree of influence technology is having over player skill as the primary factor for success in bowling today at all levels.

As the national governing body of the sport, USBC's pledge is to uphold its responsibility of maintaining the highest standards for credibility and integrity for bowling. Other sports' national governing bodies (such as USA Track and Field, United States Tennis Association, United States Golf Association, USA Hockey, etc.) make a similar promise to promote and develop their sports' growth; to provide vision and leadership.

Like most sports, bowling's equipment and playing fields have evolved for decades as technology has improved. Different eras are defined by their distinct environments. From wood to synthetic lanes, from rubber to plastic to urethane balls, from oiling the lanes with a spray gun to utilizing $20,000 lane machines. Scores have shot up at an alarming rate and the qualities necessary to succeed in the game have been clouded like never before in the history of the game.

However, not until the late '80s with the limited distance lane dressing rule was there a disproportionate rise in scoring. Then, in the early '90s, with the advent of exotic core designs in balls and reactive resin bowling balls followed by the invention of particle balls in the late '90s, the pins didn't have a chance. The pins appear incapable of resisting the power generated by those balls on current typical lane conditions. Scores have shot up at an alarming rate and the qualities necessary to succeed in the game have been clouded like never before in the history of the game.

Other sports have struggled with lassoing in the power of technology. In golf, for example, a current debate rages over the flying distance of the golf ball and the power of the modern titanium driver. Golf, though, has been fortunate that scoring has not been as disproportionately affected. Still, classic golf courses are being lengthened, and at especially the pro level, strategies such as altering pin placements are being used to demand more precision and all-around games from players who possess power provided by technology.

In tennis, bigger, lighter rackets have allowed serve speeds to skyrocket. Also, power is generated from the baseline like never before, so past greats such as John McEnroe question the loss of finesse and necessity to come to the net as a detriment to tennis' health.

In baseball, long-held records for home-run hitting were obliterated in the past two decades when performance enhancing drugs found their way into the game. Statistics are important to the fabric of baseball, and Major League Baseball has promised to do something about that problem.

By addressing the issue of credibility in bowling, USBC is sending a strong message: Through ongoing research and conviction, it will not allow technology to continue progressing to the point where it overwhelms player skill. A ball should not be the most important factor for success. Whether or not bowling can restore skill as the predominant attribute to score remains to be seen. But with stricter USBC guidelines, diligence and the entire industry working together, the unprecedented scenario we have witnessed over the past two decades will not progress and never happen again.

USBC's goal is not to simply lower scores. It wishes to better define the "stars" of the sport, and to maintain and grow a more endearing, challenging game.

As lessons from bowling's past and other sports' defining stages of growth attest, it's having stars like Marshall Holman or Tiger Woods or Babe Ruth or Mia Hamm or Serena Williams that are critical. Stars are inspirational.

In bowling, the line separating the stars from the masses has been blurred due to modern technology and therefore needs redefinition. As a result, the USBC Equipment Specifications team is studying all segments of the System of Bowling that impact the ability of the outside world to identify stars.

The System of Bowling includes the lanes, oil patterns, pins and bowling balls. All opportunities for change in these areas will happen only after open discussions with all those that may be affected in the industry. But make no mistake, there will be change.

Unlike the USGA, which in recent years deemed golf acceptable from a skill vs. technology standpoint and from that point pledged a continued monitoring of technological advancements, USBC has not made that declaration.

Instead, USBC has identified the qualities of bowling that make it a lifelong sport with the ability to form deep emotional bonds. In protecting the future of the game as national governing body, USBC intends to bring them all back into the equation.

Over the past 20 years, bowling's credibility has been compromised, indeed damaged, due to a failure to control different technological advancements. This is of no particular fault of bowling center proprietors, bowling ball manufacturers or bowlers. They were playing by the rules before them.
 
Re: USBC and the plan (PART 2)

As a result, the newly-formed USBC is taking a step forward to first admit there is a problem with the essence of the game.

Evidence of these concerns:

1) There has been an explosion of award scores. For example, in the 1979-80 season there were 4,799,195 members of the American Bowling Congress who bowled a total of 5,373 perfect 300 games. Compare the 2003-04 season when ABC membership had dropped to 1,578,374 bowlers, yet the number of 300 games shot up to 46,272. In 1979-80, the Women's International Bowling Congress had 4,232,143 league bowlers, with 61 perfect games. Comparatively, with 1,157,308 WIBC league bowlers last year, there were 1,020 300 games. There have been seven 900 three-game series' bowled since 1997, none sanctioned before that in the history of the game. (See graphics).

graph-members.gif

graph-300.gif

graph-800.gif


2) The number of league bowlers and bowling centers across the country have declined over the same time period the scoring credibility has waned. While certainly not the primary factor in this decline, a small percentage of people who have quit bowling have blamed easy scoring conditions and a lack of a challenge for their growing disinterest in the game.

3) There is a disconnect between pro and amateur bowling, resulting in a lack of respect for professionals. Sports fans watch the best players of a sport to learn from them, enjoy their heightened talent and for entertainment. Today, amateurs bowling once a week in leagues are averaging higher scores than the greatest players in the game. Professional bowling, once a staple of network television enjoying high ratings, lost its longtime network affiliation with ABC-TV in 1997, had two years of network coverage CBS until 1999 and has yet to regain it. The PBA Tour nearly dissolved prior to 2000 and the purchase of the league by entrepreneurs, and the Professional Women's Bowling Association has ceased operation. "Why should I watch (a pro) bowl 185 when I can bowl 220 at home," is a common reason given for the decreased passion in watching pro bowlers on TV.

4) The concept of practice and receiving coaching has been reduced with the lack of precision necessary to excel in today's game. Bowlers with a false sense of security do not see the need to refine their games, and thus lose a special connection to a sport that comes from hard work rewarded. Coached athletes stay with a game longer and more intensely.

5) Youth and senior bowlers are bowling at increased averages and earning soaring percentages of award scores, skewing the rational sports fan's understanding of the athleticism necessary to succeed. Between January 3 and April 1 this year, 400 perfect games were bowled by kids under age 17. Records were set by seniors when a 77-year-old woman bowled 300 in 2002 and an 87-year-old man in 2001.

6) The scoring boom is not helping to combat bowling's public perception problem, which teeters on the edge of acceptance in the American sports media. A familiar (unwarranted) debate asks the question of whether bowling is a sport at all. Continued media coverage of bowling's scoring boom has generated the following headlines in the country's largest circulated newspapers: "300 loses luster: Bowling struggles with credibility as perfect games become routine" - USA Today, 2002. "Every Man a Kingpin: How to succeed in bowling without really trying" - New York Times, 2003

It is not merely scoring that defines credibility in bowling.
Simply lowering scores by allowing only prohibitive lane dressing strategies is not the solution to reaching the goals of USBC. No one wants a game that is tricked up to prevent high scores.

USBC wants to provide certified parameters of the game that result in the demand of a combination of skills. There lies the true credibility. To know when credibility has been restored, we must first define the virtues of athleticism that made bowling America's favorite game. In no particular order: Technique.
Timing.
Accuracy.
Knowledge.
Strategy.
Power.
Consistency.
Versatility.
Focus.

Most of all, the challenge must be restored. Challenge to carry all 10 pins, challenge to reach perfection for any one game, and the challenge to rise above and become a star based on the above skill sets. Not a reliance on technology.

Today, the USBC Sport Bowling lane conditioning specifications strive to give bowlers who choose to take that particular challenge an opportunity to determine their true skills in such areas as accuracy, consistency, the ability to read lanes, and spare shooting skills to have success rather than rely on forgiving lane patterns to achieve high honor awards.

AulbyMike.jpg
"High end bowlers on certain lane conditions can just look at an area, not a board. There is no reason to practice or work at it."
- Mike Aulby

Mike Aulby is similar to Marshall Holman in many ways. He also is a gifted champion bowler, with a Hall-of-Fame career and 26 PBA Tour titles. Aulby, who differs in that he is a left-handed bowler, agrees with Holman that it is time for USBC to place stricter guidelines on technology.

"It used to be even when you were bowling on blocked lanes, if you pulled it into the oil you would get a weak hit or leave the bucket," Aulby says. "Today, you pull it and the ball looks like it was shot out of a cannon. The balls are so strong."

Aulby, 45, is a three-time ABC Masters Champion. Now retired from the PBA Tour, he owns a bowling center in Lafayette, Ind., and youth leagues are named after him at the Royal Pin centers in Indianapolis. Aulby, who harbors no resentment towards the game he loves, sometimes wonders if the pins have any chance in today's game.

"With conditions helping to guide the ball in the pocket with the powerful balls and the bowlers being stronger, sometimes I wonder how certain people ever leave anything," Aulby says. "High end bowlers on certain lane conditions can just look at an area, not a board. There is no reason to practice or work at it.

"Reactive resins changed the whole equation. I remember the first time I used one, I lost a shot off my hand and it went straight down the lane but then it looked like it got kicked right," Aulby says. "I had to learn to tame the balls or else you'd get beat by others taking advantage of them.

"The bowling balls neutralize people."

Why is USBC making this stance right now?
We are at a critical and crucial time in the history of the bowling. USBC has embarked on a new mission with visionary leadership from a new board of directors. It is anchored by a newly unified stance in the sports world as the combined energy of the former American Bowling Congress, Women's International Bowling Congress, Young American Bowling Alliance and USA Bowling come together. Now is a time of great opportunity.

USBC has set goals in addressing the current credibility issues:

1. To grow the sport through the respect that credible playing fields and game parameters provides.

2. To advance the natural progression of an athletic sport that calls for a blend of power and accuracy generated by the athlete without an over reliance on technology. Bowling got off this track and now we can try to get back on, with the goal of once again introducing the enticing athletic dilemma of risk vs. reward back into the equation.

3. To identify emerging stars, who will become inspirations. By more clearly being able to define the greatest athletes in our game based on the skills that make bowling great, people will aspire to follow their careers. All sports have grown primarily by the persuasion of their most iconic figures.

4. To develop a renewed level of pride in accomplishment. At the same time, it is important not to diminish the achievements of bowlers over the past two decades. Not only have there been incredible advances in player knowledge and skill levels, but individual performances on the lanes have been remarkable at all levels of the game. A perfect game remains a rare feat, worthy of congratulations and reward. But the negative connotation of the recent drop in player skill vs. technology necessary for success has often unfairly clouded all accomplishments.

5. To enhance the perception of the sport in the eyes of the International Olympic Committee for future inclusion in the Olympic Games.

6. To make coaching and practice necessary again. Bowlers who get coaching and form a desire to continually improve will stay with this rare sport for a lifetime.
 
Re: USBC and the plan (PART 3)

AsbatyDiandra.jpg
"Right now, there are too many bowlers who have a false sense of how talented they really are because of the conditions."
- Diandra Asbaty

Diandra Asbaty, 24, is a seven-time member of Team USA. She is a world champion and national collegiate champion. A modern player, she did not learn the game during a different era, rather has thrived in today's game. Despite her success and ability to travel the world as a "professional" amateur bowler, Asbaty understands there is a problem with credibility in the game. "I look forward to the day that skill and talent will override technology," Asbaty says. "Right now, there are too many bowlers who have a false sense of how talented they really are because of the conditions. There isn't one problem, there are a handful."

USBC, as the national governing body, no longer can ignore the negative effect technology and conditions are having on the essence of the game. USBC understands that all commercial interests may be affected by its determinations which will be ongoing as new products are introduced to the game. USBC is proceeding with the best interests of the sport of bowling and its future as its guiding force.

One change to bowling ball specifications already in effect is the lowering of the maximum radius of gyration differential from .08 inches to .06 inches by Feb. 1 this year.

At the upcoming Bowl Expo, USBC will hold an industry forum for all bowling manufacturers concerning a set of three additional equipment specification modifications under consideration on June 28 from 3:30 - 6:30 p.m. at the Wyndham Orlando Resort in Orlando, Fla. Detailed explanations of the current proposed equipment specifications modifications can also be found at www.bowl.com.

USBC will host a press conference for accredited media immediately following the closed industry discussion scheduled at the Wyndham Orlando Resort on June 28 to talk about the process and timetable for decisions on the three modification proposals. Requests for credentials can be made to USBC Director of Communications Tom Clark by e-mail at [email protected].
 
Very good Wayne, a lot to think about, will they be able to turn it around, only time will tell. It may be too late to go back far enough, I know Terry Wenban left the sport because his power was nulified and the Girl's could beat him.

The Ironic thing about the former Pro-Bowlers lamenting the Reactives have ruined the game but they were the one's who started with the "Soft Plastics" which gave everybody the clues to high scoring.

willey.
 
Wayne,

Thanks for the post!!!
I found it very informative and a great read none the less.

I have not met anyone at the tournament level that doesn't want some changes to be made. The main debate is what actually needs to be changed to guide bowling in the right direction. I suppose we ultimately need to leave it up to our governing bodies to make the right changes. Hope they get it right.

Lets all just wait and see...


p.s. i must admit, it has been forever since I have left a 5pin, I would kinda be ashamed and mocked by others to leave one nowadays!!!
 
Thanks wayne for this good info.
A lot of these articles have talked about how easy it is to hit the five pin, and the pro's use new pins in all of there tournaments. But there is no mention of trying heavier new pins, or did i miss that?
regards. chris bateup
 
Chris, the pins have been getting heavier over the years, the Pro Tour has a minimum weight I think, which is heavier than the normal requirement for the Centre's.

willey.
 
I have said it before, and I will say it again.

If the only change is made in bowling balls and limiting the layouts etc, then the game will be the exclusive domain of crankers and anyone who can rev the ball enough to take maximum advantage of the swing area. I make full and frank admissions that I need all the assistance I can get from off label layouts and surface to compete with the high rev players on all but flat conditions. If these equipment changes go through and the lane conditions don't change, I might as well hang up the shoes, or concentrate purely on seniors tournaments.

If these changes are introduced IN CONJUNCTION with toughened lane conditions, ie sport patterns, then I might be able to stay competitive
 
Just to throw some food for thought into the mix... instead of increasing pin weight, Perhaps someone could look at banning alll balls above 13pd. This would not harm senior or junior bowlers, would get a bit more deflection, and therefore carry would not be as great. Cost of balls would probably go down marginally, as the raw materials used would be of a smaller quantity.

It might also help the bowlers themselves with their longevity of the sport, as there would be less impact on joints compared to a heavier ball...

Any reason why that would not be considered? Again, this is just a thought!
 
Back
Top Bottom