RobbieB
Rodentus scientificus
Hi all,
Just got the tender forms for 2008 Nationals (yes, 2008!) and it appears that the Restricted Challenge is replacing the teams event that replaced De Veer this year and will be run on the same format as the Seniors Team Challenge.
Couldn't find anything on the TBA website about it though.
Given the poor attendence at this years Nationals, I'm interested to get some comments from ex- or current De Veer/Holt bowlers as to whether they will be supporting the new event or staying with the Holt Challenge.
Also, out of the 22 days allocated to the Championships in the suggested schedule, only 7 are allocated to Singles/Doubles/Teams, the rest are booked for rep team events and tournaments. This seems unbalanced to me, and suggests that the Nationals are getting away from being what the National Championships should be.
I know Wayne C raised the idea of making Nats 2 classifications only, and I am wondering if it would be desirable/feasable to run a Graded Nationals, incorporating DeVeer/Holt/Whatever for up to current A grade, and split off the Open Champs, Aust Masters and Rachuig as a separate event. Maybe TBA could get together with Peter Coburn and anoint his Holt Carnival as the Graded Nationals and let him take care of it (IF he'd want to, of course).
I can't see two competing teams tourneys drawing from the same pool of bowlers at the same time of year both being successful, but in its current form Nats probably relies on restricted bowlers to be a success financially, for both the host centre and TBA.
Flame away guys
Cheers, Robbie.
Just got the tender forms for 2008 Nationals (yes, 2008!) and it appears that the Restricted Challenge is replacing the teams event that replaced De Veer this year and will be run on the same format as the Seniors Team Challenge.
Couldn't find anything on the TBA website about it though.
Given the poor attendence at this years Nationals, I'm interested to get some comments from ex- or current De Veer/Holt bowlers as to whether they will be supporting the new event or staying with the Holt Challenge.
Also, out of the 22 days allocated to the Championships in the suggested schedule, only 7 are allocated to Singles/Doubles/Teams, the rest are booked for rep team events and tournaments. This seems unbalanced to me, and suggests that the Nationals are getting away from being what the National Championships should be.
I know Wayne C raised the idea of making Nats 2 classifications only, and I am wondering if it would be desirable/feasable to run a Graded Nationals, incorporating DeVeer/Holt/Whatever for up to current A grade, and split off the Open Champs, Aust Masters and Rachuig as a separate event. Maybe TBA could get together with Peter Coburn and anoint his Holt Carnival as the Graded Nationals and let him take care of it (IF he'd want to, of course).
I can't see two competing teams tourneys drawing from the same pool of bowlers at the same time of year both being successful, but in its current form Nats probably relies on restricted bowlers to be a success financially, for both the host centre and TBA.
Flame away guys
Cheers, Robbie.