Search results

nice hypocritical post..... Nice to see the sheep out in force again too. as for substance. OK, AMF are renowned for laying a ditch at their centres to get people in the door.

Low numbers is partly created by the lack of advertising. It seems that totalbowling has become the only place where anything is advertised. TB is a dinosaur and is rapidly becoming obsolete. The centres need to get the message out there like they used to as TB will just not do the job.

AMF..... and therein lies your first mistake :)

Is this a case of the pattern being too hard or is it just a case of it not being as easy as they are used to?

Seriously, How about you grow up. I have not said anything bad about whoever bowled. The winners deserve it and well done to them. They still had to shoot higher scores than the rest to win. All I said was it would not surprise me if someone made negative comments about the pattern and the...

Paul, Did I complain about it? no. Did I say anyone bowled bad or did not deserve to win? no. Fact is there were unusually high scores in a place known to lay a ditch and I wont be surprised if someone posts negative comments about it.

Men 217.5 cut, women 205.5 cut and 6 x 300 games. You expect there not to be negative comments?

............

When you realise what my post meant you will realise why yours is so off the mark. The sheep who instantly clicked like might also realise.

only 6 x 300 games?

Very mature Androo. good to see.

I should be careful should I Michael? Is that some sort of veiled threat? I really don't care who you think you are. Why not come out and say what you mean? PS: I just got a 1 week ban for being an assclown, and admin is sick of my dribble. See you soon :)

Michael, nice little rant but where in that post of mine did I refer to yourself other than the first line? And I did not ask for an explanation, I said "compared to what?". All that requires is a straight comparison or mention of a ball or 2. It does not require you to try and put words in...

I asked for an explanation Michael? I believe I said "compared to what?". I constantly tell others to quote me instead of making up ****. They can't. Yet when I actually do quote something that someone actually posted it is wrong. It just goes to show the mentality on here. The same...

Whatever Michael. You said it, I quoted it. You can try and worm out of it however you want.

Grenade best by far. Mine makes an appearance quite often.

Unlike other people on here I read what is posted and I am able to quote it if required.

stronger compared to what? There are a number of balls on the market with as strong, sometimes stronger, backends than the storm stuff.

Like anyone else who asks this question you should see your local proshop owner and get their opinion based on how you bowl. And I still think storm is garbage. Only ever had one and will only ever have one. Tried a number of the others and Storm is by far the worst I have ever had.

The storm brand is for the sheep out there. "Look, they got a storm ball so I should".

Does that mean that anyone can bowl even if they are not registered with the TBA and do not pay sanctions, as long as they are a member of their local association? Given the expansion of both Melbourne and Geelong, how does the 60km rule work now?

A good release only needs to be consistent. Same release every time. Then you deal with where the ball needs to be on the lane. And yes, there seems to be more ditches appearing all the time, mainly AMF ones.

That is due to the ditch that Mentone always lays. They are hardly a relevant or good example, unless you want an extreme of how easy it can be made by centres who want to do that. Yes I said it. Mentone is a f----king joke.

RotoGrip Grenade - best choice by far.

Yep, it clearly says "with tertiary qualifications in either journalism or communication " but it means something else. Unbelievable.....